| The activated set of focus alternatives facilitates the processing of ellipses ▪ Lena Benz, Shravan Vasishth, & Malte Zimmermann (University of Potsdam) |
| The role of speaker conventionality in preschoolers’ use of referential context: Evidence from eye movements ▪ Jared Berman, Julie Sedivy, Monica Hernandez, & Susan A. Graham (University of Calgary) |
| Friend or confederate: Conversation and a concurrent visuomotor task ▪ Tim Boiteau, Pat Malone, & Amit Almor (University of South Carolina) |
| I can tell from your voice: Adults and children use speaker identity to generate predictions during incremental sentence comprehension ▪ Arielle Borovsky & Sarah Creel (University of California, San Diego) |
| Antecedent topicality affects the processing of both NP anaphors and pronouns ▪ Evgenia Borshchevskaya & Amit Almor (University of South Carolina) |
| The mechanics of causal interpretation: Explaining implicit verb causality ▪ Oliver Bott (University of Tübingen) & Torgrim Solstad (Norwegian University of Science and Technology & University of Stuttgart) |
| The collective bias? Using eye movements to examine collective vs. distributive interpretations of plural sets ▪ Christine Boylan, Dimka Atanassov, Florian Schwarz, & John Trueswell (University of Pennsylvania) |
| Stress matters revisited: A boundary change experiment ▪ Mara Breen (Mount Holyoke College) & Charles Clifton, Jr. (University of Massachusetts, Amherst) |
| Preceding prosody influences metrical expectations during online sentence processing ▪ Meredith Brown, Anne Pier Salverda (University of Rochester), Laura C. Dilley (Michigan State University), & Michael K. Tanenhaus (University of Rochester) |
| Utterance planning and articulatory duration ▪ Alexandros Christodoulou & Jennifer E. Arnold (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) |
| Anticipation in real-world scenes: The role of visual context and visual memory ▪ Moreno I. Coco (University of Edinburgh), George L. Malcolm (University of Glasgow), & Frank Keller (University of Edinburgh) |
| Can syntax influence morphological complexity? Evidence from the gender congruency effect ▪ Clara Cohen & Susanne Gahl (University of California, Berkeley) |
| Referential forms in ADHD Children’s Narrative ▪ Maria Luiza Cunha Lima & Adriana Tenuta (Federal University of Minas Gerais) |
| Naturalness of lexical alternatives predicts time course of scalar implicatures ▪ Judith Degen & Michael K. Tanenhaus (University of Rochester) |
| Electrophysiological evidence of additional structure in intensional transitive constructions ▪ Francesca Delogu (Saarland University) & Francesco Vespignani (University of Trento) |
| Congruence effects in narrative time shifts ▪ Jeruen E. Dery & Jean-Pierre Koenig (University at Buffalo) |
| A computational model of discourse predictions in sentence processing ▪ Amit Dubey, Frank Keller, & Patrick Sturt (University of Edinburgh) |
| Subject-verb agreement in Persian ▪ Aazam Feizmohammadpour & Wind Cowles (University of Florida) |
| Task-constraints (but not semantic association) facilitate perspective use during discourse interpretation ▪ Heather Ferguson, Jumana Ahmad, Philip Ulrich, Markus Bindemann (University of Kent), & Ian Apperly (University of Birmingham) |
| Language experience accounts for individual differences in syntactic processing: Evidence from multi-level modeling ▪ Scott H. Fraundorf, Eun-Kyung Lee, & Duane G. Watson (University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign) |
| Case-neutralized NPs in Tagalog and the nature of heavy shift ▪ Michael Frazier (Northwestern University) |
| Error attraction and syntactic priming in subject-verb agreement production ▪ Whitney J. Fropf & Maryellen C. MacDonald (University of Wisconsin, Madison) |
| The rational integration of noise and prior semantic expectation: Evidence for a noisy-channel model of sentence interpretation ▪ Edward Gibson & Leon Bergen (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) |
| The parsing of Spanish object clitics by 4-year-olds ▪ Theres Grüter (University of Hawai’i at Mānoa), Nereyda Hurtado, & Anne Fernald (Stanford University) |
| Grounding of anaphora in pointing gestures: Order of mention and prominence ▪ Barbara Hemforth (CNRS & University of Paris Diderot), Anne-Sophie Homassel (University of Paris Descartes), Daniel Müller Feldmeth, & Lars Konieczny (University of Freiburg) |
| Cumulative semantic interference persists even in highly constraining sentences ▪ Daniel Kleinman (University of California, San Diego), Elin Runnqvist (Universitat de Barcelona), Albert Costa (Universitat Pompeu Fabra), & Victor S. Ferreira (University of California, San Diego) |
| Evaluation of a Bayesian belief-updating model for the time course of linguistic adaptation ▪ Dave Kleinschmidt & T. Florian Jaeger (University of Rochester) |
| How does animacy affect word order in a VOS language ▪ Takuya Kubo (Hiroshima University), Hajime Ono (Kinki University), Mikihiro Tanaka (Showa University), Masatoshi Koizumi (Tohoku University), & Hiromu Sakai (Hiroshima University) |
| Online use of relational structural information in processing bound-variable pronouns ▪ Dave Kush, Jeff Lidz, & Colin Phillips (University of Maryland, College Park) |
| Dissociating influences on prosodic prominence: Repetition shortens words but predictability lengthens words in Korean ▪ Tuan Lam & Duane G. Watson (University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign) |
| Syntactic parsing reduced to its core ▪ David James Lobina & José Eugenio García-Albea (Universitat Rovira i Virgili) |
| Grammatical or notional number? 3-year-olds’ production and comprehension of verb agreement ▪ Cynthia Lukyanenko & Cynthia Fisher (University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign) |
| Info/information theory: Speakers actively choose shorter word in predictable contexts ▪ Kyle Mahowald & Evelina Fedorenko (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), Steven Piantadosi (University of Rochester), & Edward Gibson (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) |
| Cue-based retrieval interference during ellipsis: ERP evidence ▪ Andrea E. Martin, Mante S. Nieuwland, & Manuel Carreiras (Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language) |
| Syntactic probability influences duration ▪ Claire Moore-Cantwell (University of Massachusetts, Amherst) |
| Filling and revising a gap in Chinese: What does it tell us about semantic and syntactic processing? ▪ Shukhan Ng & Nicole Y. Y. Wicha (University of Texas, San Antonio) |
| Retrieval interference in the resolution of anaphoric PRO ▪ Dan Parker, Sol Lago, & Colin Phillips (University of Maryland, College Park) |
| The mental representation of plurals ▪ Nikole D. Patson (The Ohio State University), Tessa Warren, & Gerret George (University of Pittsburgh) |
| Experience-dependent predictive processes in learning novel verb bias: An ERP study ▪ Zhenghan Qi & Susan Garnsey (University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign) |
| Communication breakdown induces audience design strategies ▪ Jennifer M. Roche (University of Rochester), Rick Dale (University of California, Merced), & Roger Kreuz (University of Memphis) |
| An ERP study of semantic processing in Austrian sign language (ÖGS): The case of antonyms and classifiers ▪ Dietmar Roehm, Julia Krebs (University of Salzburg), & Ronnie Wilbur (Purdue University) |
| The effects of addressee attention on prosodic prominence ▪ Elise C. Rosa, Kayla Finch, Molly Bergeson, & Jennifer E. Arnold (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) |
| What can the brain tell us about some? ▪ Einat Shetreet (Havard University & Children’s Hospital Boston), Gennaro Chierchia (Havard University), & Nadine Gaab (Havard University & Children’s Hospital Boston) |
| Processing temporality: Syntactic position determines interpretation ▪ Britta Stolterfoht (University of Tübingen) |
| Mirror recursion learning in the Box Prediction artificial grammar paradigm ▪ Whitney Tabor, Pyeong Whan Cho, & Emily Szkudlarek (University of Connecticut & Haskins Laboratories) |
| Priming during real-time comprehension of code-switched utterances ▪ Malathi Thothathiri, Daniel Grodner, David Nahmias, & Mariela Puentes (Swarthmore College) |
| Contextual effects on figurative language processing: Activation vs. suppression ▪ John Tomlinson, Jr., Lewis Bott (Cardiff University), & Stavros Assimikapoulos (University of Malta) |
| Syntactic priming in noun vs. verb attachment ambiguities: Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking ▪ Traxler, M. J., Boudewyn, M. A., Zirnstein, M., & Swaab, T. Y. (University of California, Davis) |
| Contrastive and non-contrastive Poset-licensing of German marked word order ▪ Thomas Weskott (University of Göttingen), Robin Hörnig (University of Tübingen), Gisbert Fanselow (University of Potsdam), & Reinhold Kliegl (University of Potsdam) |
| Is children’s reading “good-enough”? Linking real-time processing and comprehension in children’s reading ▪ Elizabeth Wonnacott (University of Warwick), Kate Nation, & Holly Joseph (University of Oxford) |
